Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Dangling On A Thread - The Execution of Gary Glitter.

Last night's Channel 4 docudrama, "The Execution of Gary Glitter", has certainly divided opinion. A quick Google search reveals many who think it is pro- or anti- death penalty, and many others who claim it soberly provides us with both sides of the argument.* I'd argue, though, that it was less about the debate and more about the people who argue over it.

I shan't bore you too much with the details... Real life rock star/nonce Gary Glitter (nee Paul Gadd) is tried for child rape committed in South East Asia, but the twist is that this is in an alternate timeline where the UK has reintroduced hanging for murder and child abuse... (And presumably crimes committed in other countries.) After a vulgar trial and an intentionally short 30-day wait, he then goes to the gallows... And that's it.

But what stands out, as said, are the characters. None of them are savoury. Glitter is arrogant and stupid, his paedophilia (if not his conviction for rape) obvious in terms of his delusional, self-pitying behaviour. True, the real Glitter would probably flounce to the gallows like a latter-day Jack Shepherd, eager for one last bout of attention whoring, if - that is - they really ever did get to hang him. But there's little to engage us with the pig-headed sobbing wretch we are presented with here, even though what is most disturbing about the real Gadd was how easily he won the public over before he was exposed, and still probably could if these events were real.

The rest of the cast is not likeable either, again deliberately. Real life Journos Gary Bushell and Miranda Sawyer send up their respective grubby rabble rousing and lazy broadsheet vapidity with the same glee that drove Davina McCall to be turned into a zombie in Dead Set. Whereas, right wing politician Ann Widdecombe, media hound that she is, doesn't seem to be in on the joke. But it's the solipsistic barristers, pompous judges, dubious witnesses, the jury that tries Gadd not just for rape but what his popular image has come to represent, the whining and mewling and ultimately hypocritical antis, the hysterical and bloodthirsty bully-boy pros and of course a public that seems hell-bent on turning the first execution on British soil in decades into a circus and freakshow, that stand out as monsters. Not the child-abusing kind, mind you, but the kind of monster that finds vicarious delight through the horror of child abuse and feeds off the hate it engenders or which derives a perverse thrill in shedding tears for a pervert. The drama makes one point clear: the society that hangs Gary Glitter is in its own way every bit as depraved and fucked up.

Not all the characters are unlikeable however. The American death row chaplain, flown over to administer to Glitter's final 30 days, is sympathetic and kind, and perhaps the only truly moral figure in the show due to his compassion and honest intentions. While the hangman himself is an interesting figure - impartial and professional, without agenda and motivated only by duty. He stands in stark contrast to the howling mob outside and the shrill, sanctimonious home secretary he ultimately takes order from, who may either be an insincere hack playing to the mob or who is genuinely intoxicated by the fumes of her hellfire sermons, or perhaps a mixture of both.

So far, so good. But ultimately, "The Execution of Gary Glitter" is undermined by its lack of real merit. Whilst the writers may argue that they are simply trying to engender debate, the faint sleaziness of the premise rather does in any claims of serious docudrama making. What one is left with as the trap is pulled and Gadd finally swings is not a sense of outrage or elation, but a cold, bleak and dirty emptiness, like staring into a pit of total despair and degradation for 90 minutes. Apart from lazily fitting into a British tradition of overwrought pessimism-for-pessimism's-sake in drama, literature and media, the show also chickens out by putting Gadd's neck on the line rather than its own. For in the end what really stands out is the script's own cowardice, its own unwillingness to pick a side and stand up for it, come what may.



* And lots of other people who think it is lurid, exploitative trash.

Sunday, 1 November 2009

Horribly Biased Thoughts On Manga And Anime.

A web forum I occasionally frequent had a recent thread which roared - 'Modern Anime Is Cobblers!' Anime is, for those with full time jobs and sex lives, Japanese animation in all its lurid and varied forms, alongside its 2D first cousin, Manga, or Japanese comics. I would explain more, but I have a sneaking suspicion you can all use Google and Wikipedia.

But getting back to that forum discussion, what did I add to the debate? This: Most anime is a load of crap. Do you like unoriginal, regurgitated ideas mated with worn-out visual cliches, casual mysoginy, convoluted scripts that would make an autistic blush and weak storylines dragged out over too many episodes? Then Anime/Manga's your scene, man. Just make sure you don't get done for noncing and keep that Deedlit costume well pressed and dry cleaned.

That's not to say that there isn't good anime or manga. There is, and that's me speaking as a Lupin III/Hideshi Hino fan. Not all Studio Ghibli is as good as claimed (Princess Monomoke is po-faced, humourless, needlessly complicated and convoluted while Earthsea should be lead to the bottom of the garden and shot), but there is some seriously good shit coming out of Miyazaki's magic workshop too. When it works, the output of the Totoro mob is on par with the Pixar juggernaut - it entertains and dazzles in equal measure.

But perhaps that's the point: I like Devilman: The Birth and Space Adventure Cobra and Urusei Yatsura simply because they're fun and have good, strong stories. Their Japaneseness has never been as important as whether they are any good. But then for the Otaku and the blasted mutant wasteland that is 4Chan, all those cliches, tropes and inaccessible signifiers are precisely the point - storytelling is and has always been secondary to the anal obsessiveness and seperateness that anime instills in its most driven fans. Others might, however, prefer to be actually entertained.

Thursday, 22 October 2009

A Morbid Sweating Lust For Clive James.

While it's fashionable to take the piss out of Australia (Lovecraftian wildlife, Skippy actually being a fraud, Vegemite giving you women's breasts etc.), it's easy to forget that this is where Clive James also came from.

Fortunately, Clive himself has been reminding us why he has been so kind as to doss on the UK's collective mind-sofa since 1962 by reading extracts from his new autobiography, The Blaze of Obscurity on BBC Radio 4 (last episode is tomorrow). It covers his career in TV, but in many ways says more about him than his job.

Here he demonstrates all the kindness, wisdom and sharp observation that hides under the louche, almost complacent drawl. But also, the inherent oddness of being able to meet mega stars and Hugh Hefner, NFL man-gods and politicians, while remaining detached and true enough to avoid the (nowadays) inevitable star-fucking drivel of today's 'sleb' culture. It is, after all, one thing to be able to interview Tammy Faye Bakker, but it takes someone of James' honesty and independence to recognise her humanity, for all the shit hurled at her during her life.

And that's the point - anyone can show clips of Japanese men being forced to eat worms in a weird gameshow. Yet James stands out because you can tell he's not pretending to enjoy it at all or side entirely with a snearing audience. There's a clear hint of skepticism and cynicism in his voice and expressions, but not about the content so much as the act of watching it. The joke's on us messed up voyeurs, and Clive James is the first to admit it.

Sunday, 11 October 2009

The Withered Future.

The big world changing innovation of 1989 might surprise you. It was in fact the humble Game Boy. As a piece of consumer electronics, it was, as we know, a big hit with the kids. But it also did something unusual. Rather than develop new technology, it reused what was already there.

After all, the GB’s black-and-white, Z80 processor technology was not cutting edge. In fact it was almost a decade old by this time. Yet it was not what the Gameboy could do that was unique, it was how it did it. The Gameboy was smaller and more battery efficient than its rival handhelds, it was reliable and it could be easily programmed, unlike other consoles before or since that seem hooked on the latest and often most costly gimmick.

Underpinning this was the philosophy of the Game Boy's designer: the late Gunpei Yakoi (1941-1997). He referred to his use of existing, tested and cheap know-how as ‘Lateral Thinking of Withered Technology’, and it is, at present, a concept that remains caged in the video games ghetto.

Yet if applied to areas outside of gaming, withered technology is potentially world changing. Take cars, those four-wheeled double-edged swords we both fret about and go shopping in. Instead of looking to some distant future of eco-friendly hydrogen-powered cars, why not refine what we can already do? Design cars that are modular in construction, for example. You can simply remove one older part for a newer, more efficient (or less broken) component when it becomes available rather than scrap the whole thing. Make car chassis from lighter, less resource hungry components and make them ergonomically styled so they can travel with less wind resistance, saving on petrol. Or make the venerable old internal combustion engine ever more fuel efficient and smaller, using less resources but being also cheaper to make.

A similar contribution can be made to healthcare. While we all seem obsessed about the cost of healthcare, no one is again asking how the price of medical treatment can be brought down. Right now, the average MRI machine can cost millions, operations tens of thousands and long term care can stretch into the hundreds of thousands. So why can’t researchers refine what they have got, making an MRI scanner cost half, or a quarter or even a tenth of what it costs now? As the Washington Post’s TR Reid points out, Japanese medical research labs have been doing precisely this for a while now, and the main beneficiaries have been Japanese patients, and indeed Japanese tax payers.

And then there is power generation. While we all panic about power stations spiking Co2 levels like a Mohican, the answer may be local, and withered. Every local community could have its own power source based on what is already available: coastal communities could have their own wave generators, hilly areas their own wind turbines and towns with rivers their own hydroelectric plants. Or even the Hyperion mini nuclear reactor, able to power small city blocks or villages. Local power generators for local communities not only means stronger infrastructure but also more efficiency as less electricity would be lost along long distance power lines.

We don’t even need to build new eco-towns. Existing buildings can be readapted via government or private sector grants to retain more heat, save more electricity and use water more efficiently. Let individual households and businesses make the decision, altering their houses with better insulation, more wind and solar power, and even geothermal power, making the most use of what we already have.

And withered technology could be the answer for the developing world too. Refining existing technologies, making them cheaper and more easily available would be a boon for the poor. Why not find ways to improve their farming, ensure they have sanitation, give them affordable health care and easy access to heat, electricity and the World Wide Web? Or perhaps we can find far more efficient ways of developing the Third World’s human capital, making them more productive and their lives less perilous. This is all possible now; it just requires new ways of making the delivery of these resources easier and more economical.

There is, as there always is, a downside though. Too much focus on withered technology may stop new ideas and developments taking root. But if we will always need the new, we also need to make the most of what we have too. The future should be withered.

Tuesday, 4 August 2009

Random Verse Outpouring - 'None of It Mattered'.

A day will come
When none of this matters
When all the charades and the farces
Blow away in the wind
And all the nonsense
And lies comes clean.

Click Here to Read More!

Monday, 3 August 2009

Shameless Plug #1



The above image is © Mark Hoaksey, etc. etc.

Out now is the latest issue of Powerplay Magazine, issue 112, featuring an in-depth interview with controversial pop type metal persons Dead by April, as written by yours truly.

There's also an interview with Arch Enemy, a chat with Dez Fafara and loads of reviews, some of which have also poured out of my over-flowing pen.

Anyway, it's almost £4.00 and it's on sale at WH Smith's, so buybuybuy!

Monday, 20 July 2009

Rabbit, Rabbit and Rabbits At The Town Show.

The Dagenham Town Show was a good experience, despite the gale force winds and the looming threat of rain. There were lots of stalls in the community and society tents, there was a fun fair and you could even get a ride on a helicopter (if you had the money).

Click Here to Read More!

Thursday, 16 July 2009

The Friday Short Story: Derelict

It's dusk. I never come out by day, only at dusk.

I'm hiding in a filthy, piss-yellow skip off Oxford Street, in Ramillies Place. I lift the top out and slink out. Flies blow out in my wake. I seem to be sleeping with every louse in town. I can feel the itch of their bites as they scab over.

There is dried blood on my chin.
Click Here to Read More!

You Have (Not) Been Watching (Proper Charlie Brooker).

Contrary to the song, Charlie Brooker is not right about everything. Zombies don't run, end of. The Wire is just another US cop show once you get past the flourishes. And Quake wasn't really that good either.

Still, the Boy Brooker, a roaring mass of rage, self-deprecating angst and lucidity, is right 90% of the time, which is a damn sight more than most meeja creatures. So it's a bit depressing to see him slumming it on a sort of ghastly vehicle on Channel 4.

Said vehicle, 'You Have Been Watching' (Wednesdays, Channel 4, 10pm), has pretty much everything that Brooker does well. The bitter, incisive critique of shit TV remains sharp and the man's wisdom-disguised-as-snark is all present and correct. It's all in the same tone as his journalism, his tv shows and his overall output. So far, so good. He remains the boy who points out that the Emperor's knob is waving around, and that there really is something interesting going on behind that curtain.

The problem lies in who he's addressing this to. Whereas before, with his journalism and his TV shows, you always felt like he was directly addressing you, and in terms of format, he was. It's hard not to watch Screenwipe or Newswipe and not feel that he was having a direct conversation with his audience.

But in YHBW, he's not talking to the viewer any more. No, he has a panel of celebrity guests to talk to instead. He's talking to some silly broad you've never heard of, one or two Barry Shitpeas-types who have a crap show in the Edinburgh fringe to plug and some comedian who was funny in the 90s but now seems paid to have that sort of snide cynicism British people often have when they can't be arsed to have a properly thought-out opinion.

Brooker himself has hit out at 'the talent', yet here he is in the midst of all that bullshit. Worst still, he's also got a live audience of people who laugh out loud whenever anything funny or meant to be funny is said. It's canned laughter, which is to say, yet more bullshit. The old school viewer is left watching on the sidelines, listening in like an eavesdropping orphan as Brooker tries to force himself to actually like talking to these dipshits while the punters watching from the stands giggle unconvincingly. Ever had a cool friend who dumps you to hang out with utter cocks who seem to be more popular? That, dear reader, is what YHBW is all about.

But in doing so, it loses what was so strong and urgent about Brooker's output. It works best when he's actually looking you in the eye, and he seems far too ashamed to do that in this show, so he looks at the non-entities sitting next to him instead. It's satire in sore need of satirising. I sincerely hope it flops so he can go back to doing what he does best, which is to say, actually being Charlie Brooker.

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

What This Blog Will Do Now.

Readers,

It's time to diversify. Mainly this is due to me being too busy to update the blog with new material all the time. But I also write lots of other things and it's time to give them a platform too. So from now on, I still will post up the occasional piece about life in London, but I will also post short stories I've written - with a mostly London-based theme - and the odd article on whatever is obsessing me these days.

I'll also be plugging my work for Powerplay Magazine, which is available in all good WH Smiths outlets, a wonderful publication, fun for all the family, blahblahblah.

Some caveats: firstly, no I don't want any submissions. If I do publish anyone else's work it will be because I already know them and we've agreed to it as a one-off. Anyone else who sends me anything will be reminded of this (politely) by e-mail and then their submission will be deleted.

Also, everything on this blog, except where stated, is © Me. If you wish to reproduce anything, you will need my express permission or I will set the baying hounds on you.